The most popular Amplitude alternatives & competitors, compared
Contents
Amplitude is a solid product analytics platform – it's powerful, mature, and trusted by thousands of companies – but it's not the right fit for every team.
Maybe you need error tracking or LLM analytics that Amplitude doesn't offer. Maybe you're looking for a more developer-friendly platform. Maybe you just want to see what's out there; whatever the case, there are alternatives worth considering.
In this guide, we compare the best Amplitude alternatives across analytics, session replay, experimentation, and more so you can find the right fit for your team and use case.
1. PostHog
- Founded: 2020
- Most similar to: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo
- Typical users: Engineers, product, and growth teams
- Typical customers: Mid-size product-focused B2Bs and startups

What is PostHog?
PostHog (that's us 👋) is an all-in-one platform combining product analytics, session replay, feature flags, error tracking, LLM analytics, A/B testing, and user surveys into one product. This means it's not just an alternative to Amplitude, but also tools like LaunchDarkly and FullStory.
Typical PostHog users are engineers, founders, and product managers at startups and mid-size companies, particularly B2B companies. Customers include AssemblyAI, Hasura, Vendasta, and Airbus.
Key features
Product analytics: Funnels, user paths, retention analysis, custom trends, and dynamic user cohorts. Also supports SQL insights for power users.
A/B tests: Up to 10 test variations, primary and secondary metrics. Automatically calculate test duration, sample size, and statistical significance.
Session replays: Including event timelines, console logs, network activity, a DOM explorer, and more with 5,000 free recordings per month.
Surveys: Target surveys by event or person properties. Templates for net promoter score (NPS), product-market fit (PMF) surveys, and more.
Feature flags: Rollout features safely with local evaluation (for faster performance) and JSON payloads.
Error tracking: Monitor exceptions, stack traces, and errors. Connect issues directly to session replays, user behavior, and feature flag changes.
LLM analytics: Track AI product usage, monitor model performance, analyze token costs, and debug LLM interactions.
How does PostHog compare to Amplitude?
Main differences between PostHog and Amplitude
- PostHog uses usage-based pricing (pay per event/replay); Amplitude charges per Monthly Tracked User (MTU).
- PostHog offers 1M events, 5,000 replays, 1,500 survey responses free; Amplitude offers 50K MTUs and 1,000 replays.
- PostHog includes error tracking, LLM analytics, and SQL access; Amplitude lacks error tracking and LLM analytics entirely.
- PostHog is built for engineering-led teams; Amplitude is designed for product and marketing teams.
Main similarities between PostHog and Amplitude
- Both offer product analytics with funnels, retention, cohorts, and user paths.
- Both provide session replay with mobile support (iOS, Android).
- Both are SOC 2 certified and HIPAA/GDPR compliant with EU data residency options.
- Both integrate with major CDPs like Segment and Rudderstack.
Why do companies use PostHog?
According to reviews on G2, companies use PostHog because:
It replaces multiple tools: PostHog replaces Amplitude (analytics), LaunchDarkly (feature flags and A/B testing), and Hotjar (feedback and surveys). This simplifies workflows and ensures all their data is in one place.
Pricing is transparent and scalable: Reviewers appreciate how PostHog's pricing scales as they grow. There's a generous free tier. Companies eligible for PostHog for Startups also get $50k in additional free credits.
They need a complete picture of users: PostHog includes the necessary tools to understand users and improve products. This means creating funnels to track conversion, watching replays to see where users get stuck, testing solutions with A/B/n tests, and gathering feedback with user surveys.
Bottom line
Having all the features of Amplitude (and more) while being free, self-serve, and open source makes PostHog a great alternative. This is especially true for engineering-focused startups and scale-ups as it provides the tools to build a great product.
2. Mixpanel
- Founded: 2009
- Most similar to: Heap, Amplitude, Smartlook
- Typical users: Product managers, designers, and marketing teams
- Typical customers: Mid to large B2C and B2B companies

What is Mixpanel?
Mixpanel is one of the most popular product analytics tools on the market. Founded in 2009, in recent years it's deprecated additional features, such as A/B testing, to focus on product analytics alone. Their tools enable teams to easily connect to and analyze data from their data warehouse, CDP, and application(s).
Key features
Product analytics: Track user behavior, KPIs, and core metrics with trends, retention, and flows.
Collaborative boards: Build analysis in collaborative boards that can include reports, text, videos, and GIFs. Embed these boards in other tools.
Alerts: Get automated notifications when there are anomalies in metrics or if they fall outside a positive or negative range.
Filtered data views: Hide and filter data on a per-team basis to reduce noise and separate data for privacy reasons.
How does Mixpanel compare to Amplitude?
Mixpanel and Amplitude are the original product analytics platforms and have battled for many years. Over time, Amplitude has added more features while Mixpanel remains focused on its key product analytics use cases.
Main differences between Mixpanel and Amplitude
- Mixpanel focuses purely on product analytics; Amplitude bundles analytics with experiments, feature flags, and surveys.
- Mixpanel charges per event with 1M events free; Amplitude charges per Monthly Tracked User (MTU) with 50K MTUs free.
- Mixpanel recently added session replay; Amplitude has had it longer with deeper integration.
- Amplitude can run queries directly on your data warehouse; Mixpanel syncs to/from warehouses but doesn't sit on top of them.
Main similarities between Mixpanel and Amplitude
- Both are established product analytics platforms with 10+ years in market.
- Both offer core analytics: funnels, retention, cohorts, and user paths.
- Both provide self-serve plans with free tiers.
- Both integrate with CDPs like Segment and data warehouses like Snowflake and BigQuery.
- Both are SOC 2 compliant with GDPR-ready features.
Why do companies use Mixpanel?
Looking at G2 reviews, companies choose Mixpanel to:
Eliminate the need for data analysts: Mixpanel helps reviewers structure large volumes of data, and make data-driven decisions, reducing their reliance on dedicated data analysts to produce insights.
Track and target campaigns: Marketers appreciate the ability to create user segments and target specific users, enabling more personalized campaigns and improved user engagement.
Understand user behavior: In common with most analytics tools, Mixpanel's users mostly want to understand user behavior, identify bottlenecks, and monitor core metrics like conversion rates, activation, and retention.
Bottom line
Mixpanel has been a top alternative for Amplitude as long as the two have existed. It's great if you only want product analytics, but if you are looking beyond that, there are likely better choices.
3. Pendo
- Founded: 2013
- Most similar to: PostHog, LogRocket
- Typical users: Product managers and customer success teams
- Typical customers: Product-focused small and mid-market B2C apps

What is Pendo?
Pendo describes itself as a product experience platform. It helps teams improve their user and custom experience. It does this through the combination of product analytics, session replay, in-app guides, user feedback, and product validation tools.
Key features
Product analytics: Funnels, trends, and retention analysis with event autocapture.
In-app guides: Deliver personalized guidance to customers, directly inside your app.
User feedback: Capture and analyze customer feedback at scale.
Product validation and roadmaps: Plan your product improvements and roadmap using data from Pendo.
How does Pendo compare to Amplitude?
Pendo doesn't have as deep of product analytics functionality and doesn't include A/B testing or experimentation. It focuses more on in-app guides, feedback, and other product tools (which Amplitude doesn't include). Pendo's inclusion of session replay is also a big difference.